Read the Case at the end of  Chapter 5 and respond to the following questions:Josh and Mike met each other as roommates during freshmen year at MacAlister College in St. Paul, Minnesota. Despite a rocky start they became best friends. They are planning on going on a two-week adventure together to celebrate their graduation in June. Josh has never been to Europe and wants to visit France or Spain. Mike spent a semester abroad in Aarhus, Denmark, and traveled extensively in northern Europe. Even though he never went to France or Spain, Mike wants to go to some place more exotic like South Africa or Vietnam. For the past week they have been arguing back and forth over where they should go. Josh argues that it will cost too much to fly to South Africa or Vietnam, while Mike counters that it will be much cheaper to travel in Vietnam or South Africa once they are there. Each of them agreed that they can spend no more than $3,500 each on the trip and could be gone for only two weeks. Purchase the answer to view it

Josh and Mike are roommates who have become best friends during their time at MacAlister College. They are planning on going on a two-week adventure to celebrate their graduation in June. However, they are struggling to decide on a destination for their trip.

Josh, who has never been to Europe, wants to visit either France or Spain. He is drawn to the idea of experiencing the culture, cuisine, and historical sites in these countries. On the other hand, Mike, who spent a semester abroad in Aarhus, Denmark, and traveled extensively in northern Europe, wants to go somewhere more exotic like South Africa or Vietnam. He is eager to explore new and unfamiliar territories.

The main point of contention between Josh and Mike is the cost of the trip. Josh argues that flying to South Africa or Vietnam will be too expensive. He believes that the cost of airfare alone would eat into their budget significantly. Additionally, he is concerned about the overall cost of travel and accommodations in these countries. He fears that they would end up exceeding their budget and have limited funds for other activities on the trip.

In response, Mike counters that once they are in South Africa or Vietnam, the cost of traveling within these countries would be much cheaper compared to France or Spain. He believes that the lower cost of living in these countries would allow them to stretch their budget further. He also argues that the unique experiences and adventures they would have in South Africa or Vietnam would be worth the higher upfront cost of airfare.

Both Josh and Mike agree that they can spend no more than $3,500 each on the trip and that they can only be gone for two weeks. They are determined to stick to these constraints, as they do not want financial or time limitations to hinder their overall enjoyment of the trip.

To make an informed decision, Josh and Mike need to consider several factors. Firstly, they need to assess the cost of airfare to each destination and compare it to their budget. They should also research the overall cost of travel, accommodations, and activities in each country. Additionally, they should evaluate the potential experiences and attractions each destination has to offer and consider how these align with their individual interests.

In conclusion, Josh and Mike are facing a dilemma in deciding on a destination for their graduation trip. Their differing preferences and concerns regarding cost are creating tension between them. To resolve their conflict, they need to carefully weigh the pros and cons of each option and find a compromise that aligns with their budget and desired experiences.