Read (2016). Empowering Leadership and Effective Collaboration in Geographically Dispersed Teams. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 159–198. This week’s journal articles focus on empowering leadership and effective collaboration in geographically dispersed teams, please answer the following questions: How do geographically dispersed teams collaborate effectively? Please find at least three tools on the market that teams can use to collaborate on a geographically dispersed team. Please note the pros and cons of each tool. Based on the research above, note which tool you would select if you were managing the geographically dispersed team and why. Be sure to use the UC Library for scholarly research. Google Scholar is also a great source for research. Please be sure that journal articles are peer-reviewed and are published within the last five years. The paper should meet the following requirements: 3 pages in length (not including title page or references) APA guidelines must be followed. The paper must include a cover page, an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a conclusion. A minimum of five peer-reviewed journal articles. The writing should be clear and concise. Headings should be used to transition thoughts. Don’t forget that the grade also includes the quality of writing.

Title: Empowering Leadership and Effective Collaboration in Geographically Dispersed Teams: A Comparative Analysis of Collaboration Tools

This paper aims to evaluate how geographically dispersed teams can effectively collaborate and the various tools available for facilitating such collaboration. Geographically dispersed teams present unique challenges due to physical separation, which can impact communication, task coordination, and team cohesion (Cascio & Shurygailo, 2003). Effective collaboration is crucial in such teams to ensure successful completion of tasks and attainment of team goals (Dennis, Kinney, & Ahuja, 1998). Consequently, the choice of collaboration tools is essential for geographically dispersed team managers. This paper analyzes three collaboration tools, discussing their pros and cons and concludes by identifying the most suitable tool for managing geographically dispersed teams based on empirical evidence from recent research.


Tool 1: Video Conferencing
Video conferencing is a widely used collaboration tool that enables team members to communicate and interact in real-time, as if they were in the same physical location. This tool offers several advantages, including enhanced non-verbal communication, increased team cohesion, and improved decision-making (Avolio et al., 2020). The visual cues provided during video conferencing sessions allow for a better understanding of participants’ emotions and intentions, fostering trust and rapport among team members (Huang, Wei, & Watson-Manheim, 2013). Additionally, real-time interaction facilitates immediate feedback and quicker decision-making, reducing delays and increasing efficiency (Hollingshead, McGrath, & O’Connor, 1993).

However, video conferencing also has some limitations. Technical issues such as poor audio or video quality, connectivity problems, or time lags may occur, detracting from the overall effectiveness of the communication and collaboration process (Allen, Lehmann-Willenbrock, & Glomb, 2013). Moreover, schedule coordination across time zones can be challenging, as it may require early morning or late-night meetings for some team members. Thus, while video conferencing is an effective tool for real-time collaboration, its effectiveness may be diminished by technical glitches and time zone challenges.

Tool 2: Project Management Software
Project management software provides a centralized platform for teams to manage and track project progress, share documents, assign tasks, and monitor deadlines. This tool promotes collaboration by providing a centralized repository for all project-related information and facilitates task coordination and transparency (Bechky, Okhuysen, & Waller, 2012). It allows team members to access documents and files remotely, ensuring that everyone is working with the most up-to-date information. Furthermore, project management software enables managers to monitor team member contributions, identify bottlenecks, and allocate resources efficiently (Cohen & Eisenman, 2013).

However, project management software has its limitations. It requires team members to adapt to new software platforms and may involve a steep learning curve for some individuals, leading to initial resistance and reduced productivity (Cambridge & Boudreau, 2014). Additionally, relying solely on project management software may hinder interpersonal interaction and social cohesion, as it mainly focuses on task-oriented collaboration rather than building personal relationships (Guzzo et al., 1994). Consequently, combining project management software with other collaboration tools is advisable to ensure a balance between task coordination and relationship building.

Tool 3: Instant Messaging Applications
Instant messaging applications facilitate real-time text-based communication, enabling quick exchanges of information and fostering immediate response to queries or issues. This tool offers advantages such as increased accessibility, responsiveness, and rapid decision-making (George et al., 2015). Instant messaging allows team members to communicate asynchronously, reducing dependence on synchronous communication methods and allowing greater flexibility in task completion (Hinds & Kiesler, 2002). Moreover, the use of emojis, GIFs, and other visual elements can help convey emotions and facilitate social bonding among team members in a virtual environment (Lea et al., 2021).

However, instant messaging applications also have limitations. The nature of text-based communication may limit the richness of information exchange, leading to misunderstandings or misinterpretations (Stasser, Vaughan, & Stewart, 2000). Moreover, the constant availability and notifications may disrupt individual focus and productivity, leading to potential distractions (Turkle, 2011). Additionally, the absence of non-verbal cues and tone of voice in instant messaging may hinder effective communication of sensitive or complex information (Sharma et al., 2018). Therefore, using instant messaging applications in conjunction with other communication tools is advisable to address these limitations and ensure effective collaboration.

[This is a sample of a 500-word response analyzing three collaboration tools: video conferencing, project management software, and instant messaging applications — discussing their pros and cons in the context of geographically dispersed teams. The response establishes an analytical tone and assumes the reader has extensive prior knowledge of the topic.]

Need your ASSIGNMENT done? Use our paper writing service to score better and meet your deadline.

Click Here to Make an Order Click Here to Hire a Writer