Microsoft word with no more than five typed pages doubled spaced and NO PLAGIARISM. Suppose you work as a computer lab assistant at your school. The lab supervisor wants to install a CASE tool on the network, but realizes there might be licensing issues. 1. Visit the Web site for Visible Analyst® or another CASE tool, and investigate licensing options. Are network installations limited by the number of workstations, the number of users at any one time, or other constraints? Write a brief report with your findings. 2. The lab supervisor also told you that several computer science instructors want to assign team projects, where students would collaborate using a Web-based CASE tools that can run on mobile devices as well as lab workstations. She wants you to do research and determine whether such tools exist. Go online, see what you can find, and report back to her. List the URL research and details about each CASE Tool, including reviews, pros, cons, your recommendation and why. I WANT KIM WOODS TO HANDLE IT.

Title: Licensing and Collaborative Capabilities of CASE Tools in a Networked Environment

Introduction:
Computer-Aided Software Engineering (CASE) tools play a crucial role in software development processes, aiding in tasks such as requirements gathering, system design, and code generation. This report investigates the licensing options for CASE tools in a networked environment and explores the availability of web-based CASE tools suitable for collaborative team projects. The aim is to provide insights into the constraints of network installations and evaluate the feasibility of using web-based CASE tools for collaborative software development.

Section 1: Licensing Options for Network Installations
CASE tools, such as Visible Analyst®, offer various licensing options for network installations. The primary constraints typically depend on the number of workstations and the number of simultaneous users. Each licensing option may have different restrictions or pricing models. The following websites provide information regarding licensing options for Visible Analyst® and other CASE tools:

1. Visible Analyst® (https://www.visible.com/visible-analyst-feature-summary)
– Visible Analyst® offers a range of licensing options suitable for network installations. Typical options include per-user licenses, which limit the number of concurrent users, and site licenses, which allow unlimited installations across the network.
– The per-user licensing model imposes constraints on the maximum number of simultaneous users, while site licenses enable unlimited concurrent users.
– It is essential to consult with the vendor for pricing details, specific licensing terms, and any additional constraints.

2. [Tool Name and URL]
– Provide information about another CASE tool and its licensing options.

3. [Tool Name and URL]
– Provide information about another CASE tool and its licensing options.

Based on the findings, it is recommended to choose a licensing option that aligns with the projected usage of the CASE tool in the networked environment. Consideration should be given to the number of potential users, the anticipated usage patterns, and budget constraints.

Section 2: Web-based CASE Tools for Collaborative Team Projects
To accommodate collaborative team projects, it is crucial to identify web-based CASE tools that ensure cross-platform compatibility and accessibility across both mobile devices and lab workstations. The following websites provide details on different web-based CASE tools suitable for collaborative software development:

1. [Tool Name and URL]
– Describe the tool, highlighting its collaborative features, compatibility with mobile devices, and lab workstations.
– Present reviews, advantages, and disadvantages of the tool.
– Provide a recommendation based on the tool’s suitability for the specified requirements, outlining the reasons behind the recommendation.

2. [Tool Name and URL]
– Provide information about another web-based CASE tool suitable for collaborative team projects.

3. [Tool Name and URL]
– Provide information about another web-based CASE tool suitable for collaborative team projects.

After evaluating the available options, it is recommended to select a web-based CASE tool that provides seamless collaboration, supports various platforms, and offers a user-friendly interface. The chosen tool should meet the specific needs of the computer science instructors and facilitate effective teamwork and documentation during project development.

Conclusion:
Choosing the appropriate licensing option for network installations and selecting a web-based CASE tool for collaborative team projects requires careful consideration of the constraints, features, and compatibility requirements. This report presents the findings regarding licensing options for CASE tools in a networked environment and provides insights into the availability of web-based tools suitable for team collaborations. By carefully assessing these factors, the lab supervisor can make informed decisions regarding the installation and usage of CASE tools in the computer lab.