You are analyzing packet captures from a wireless network to assess if the captures pose a threat, what risks, if any. For this assignment, the packet captures provided by Wireshark by doing the following: to the site, and the following: · wpa-Induction.pcap.gz Wi-Fi 802.11 WPA traffic · wpa-eap-tls.pcap.gz WiFi 802.11 WPA-EAP/Rekey sample · nb6-hotspot.pcap Someone connecting to SFR’s wireless community network · ciscowl.pcap.gz (libpcap) Cisco Wireless LAN Context Control Protocol (WLCCP) version 0x0 · wap_google.pcap contains two WSP request-response dialogs Only download these sample captures. Other captures may set off your computer’s system defenses. Wireshark to view and analyze the sample captures. a 1-page table that ranks the packet captures from the highest to lowest threat. In your table provide the following for each packet capture: · Description of the traffic · Description of the risks, if any, the traffic poses to the wireless network · Countermeasures to take to secure network from any threat a 1/2- to 1-page memo to management as a network security specialist explaining the following: · How you can distinguish hostile packet data from normal packet data · How you can recognize any attack signatures in the packets you analyze · Provide a rationale for ranking the packets as you did

Analysis of Packet Captures for Threat Assessment in a Wireless Network

Introduction
Packet captures from a wireless network can provide valuable insight into potential threats and risks to the network’s security. By analyzing the captured packets, it is possible to identify malicious activities, assess the risk they pose, and determine appropriate countermeasures. This assignment involves the analysis of five packet captures obtained from Wireshark, namely: wpa-Induction.pcap.gz, wpa-eap-tls.pcap.gz, nb6-hotspot.pcap, ciscowl.pcap.gz, and wap_google.pcap.

Ranking the Packet Captures
To rank the packet captures in terms of threat level, several factors need to be considered, including the nature of the captured traffic, potential risks posed by the traffic, and the effectiveness of available countermeasures.

1. wpa-Induction.pcap.gz
Description of the traffic:
The packet capture contains Wi-Fi 802.11 Wireless Protected Access (WPA) traffic. It represents network traffic secured with WPA encryption, which is widely considered to be secure.

Description of the risks:
The risks associated with this packet capture are relatively low. Without further analysis, it is difficult to determine any specific threats or malicious activities. However, it is important to ensure that the WPA encryption is properly implemented and that strong passwords or keys are used.

Countermeasures:
To secure the network from potential threats associated with this packet capture, it is essential to ensure the ongoing integrity of the WPA encryption. This can be achieved by regularly updating firmware on access points and enforcing strong password policies.

2. wpa-eap-tls.pcap.gz
Description of the traffic:
The packet capture contains Wi-Fi 802.11 WPA-EAP/Rekey sample traffic. It represents network traffic secured with WPA Enterprise using the EAP-TLS authentication method.

Description of the risks:
The risks associated with this packet capture are also relatively low. Similar to the previous packet capture, without further analysis, it is challenging to determine any specific threats or malicious activities. However, it is crucial to ensure that the WPA Enterprise and EAP-TLS configurations are correctly implemented, and proper certificate management practices are in place.

Countermeasures:
To secure the network from potential threats associated with this packet capture, it is essential to regularly update firmware on access points, monitor certificate expiration dates, and revoke compromised certificates promptly.

3. nb6-hotspot.pcap
Description of the traffic:
The packet capture represents someone connecting to SFR’s wireless community network.

Description of the risks:
The risks associated with this capture depend on the security measures implemented by SFR’s wireless community network. It is possible that an unauthorized user could gain access to the network, potentially leading to unauthorized access to sensitive information or malicious activities within the network.

Countermeasures:
To secure the network from potential threats associated with this packet capture, SFR should implement strong authentication mechanisms such as WPA2-Enterprise with EAP-TLS and ensure the network is properly segmented to prevent unauthorized access.

4. ciscowl.pcap.gz
Description of the traffic:
The packet capture contains Cisco Wireless LAN Context Control Protocol (WLCCP) version 0x0 traffic.

Description of the risks:
The risks associated with this packet capture are relatively low. Without further analysis, it is difficult to determine any specific threats or malicious activities. However, it is crucial to ensure that WLCCP is properly configured and that any vulnerabilities associated with the protocol have been patched.

Countermeasures:
To secure the network from potential threats associated with this packet capture, it is essential to regularly update firmware on Cisco access points and ensure any known vulnerabilities related to WLCCP are addressed.

5. wap_google.pcap
Description of the traffic:
The packet capture contains two WSP (Wireless Session Protocol) request-response dialogs related to Google.

Description of the risks:
The risks associated with this packet capture are minimal. Based on the given description, it seems to represent standard web traffic to Google services. Without further analysis, it is challenging to identify any specific threats or malicious activities.

Countermeasures:
To secure the network from potential threats associated with this packet capture, standard security measures such as web filtering and content inspection should be implemented to ensure that malicious content is not accessed through Google services.

Distinguishing Hostile Packet Data and Recognizing Attack Signatures
As a network security specialist, distinguishing hostile packet data from normal packet data and recognizing attack signatures requires in-depth knowledge of network protocols, behavior patterns, and known attack techniques. Some techniques that can be employed include:

1. Analyzing packet headers and payloads for signs of anomalies or malicious activity.
2. Examining packet timings and comparing them against known attack patterns or signatures.
3. Identifying abnormal packet patterns or traffic spikes that indicate potential attacks.
4. Utilizing intrusion detection or prevention systems to detect and alert on known attack signatures.
5. Applying advanced techniques such as anomaly detection and machine learning to identify unknown or emerging threats.

Rationale for Ranking
The ranking of the packet captures is based on a preliminary assessment of the given descriptions and known threats associated with the observed protocols. Without deeper analysis and a comprehensive understanding of the network environment, it is challenging to ascertain the precise threat level. Therefore, the ranking is subject to potential revisions based on further examination.

Conclusion
Analyzing packet captures can provide valuable insights into the risks and threats faced by a wireless network. By considering the nature of the traffic, potential risks, and available countermeasures, it is possible to prioritize and address security concerns effectively. However, a comprehensive analysis and understanding of the network environment is necessary for an accurate threat assessment.

Need your ASSIGNMENT done? Use our paper writing service to score better and meet your deadline.


Click Here to Make an Order Click Here to Hire a Writer