State legislatures continue to advance policy proposals to address cyber threats directed at governments and private businesses. As threats continue to evolve and expand and as the pace of new technologies accelerates, legislatures are making cybersecurity measures a higher priority. You are to author a 2-page (maximum) paper about the “failed” amendments proposed by the Kentucky legislature in 2019 with respect to Cyber Policy.  APA format – 1 cover page, 2 content pages, and 1 reference page. You are to answer two questions in your individual papers. KY S 195 Status: Failed – Adjourned Requires a manufacturer of a connected device offered for sale in Kentucky to equip the device with reasonable security features appropriate to the nature and function of the device and to the information it may collect, contain, or transmit, and designed to protect the device from unauthorized access, destruction, use, modification, or disclosure, defines authentication, connected device, manufacturer, and unauthorized access, destruction, use, modification, of disclosure.

Title: Analysis of Failed Amendments Proposed by the Kentucky Legislature in 2019 Related to Cyber Policy

Introduction

In the face of increasing cyber threats directed at governments and private businesses, state legislatures across the United States are recognizing the need to implement effective cybersecurity measures. In 2019, the Kentucky legislature proposed amendments, namely KY S 195, aimed at addressing the issue of cybersecurity. However, these amendments failed to pass, raising questions about their effectiveness and implications. This paper aims to analyze the failed amendments proposed by the Kentucky legislature, examining their key provisions and evaluating the reasons for their failure.

Overview of KY S 195

KY S 195, a cybersecurity bill, sought to require manufacturers of connected devices sold in Kentucky to equip them with reasonable security features. These features were to be appropriate to the nature and function of the device and designed to protect the device from unauthorized access, destruction, use, modification, or disclosure. The bill further defined key terms, such as authentication, connected device, manufacturer, and unauthorized access, destruction, use, modification, or disclosure, to clarify its scope and applicability.

Analysis of KY S 195

1. Scope and Definition

KY S 195 aimed to address the growing concerns regarding the security of connected devices, which have become increasingly vulnerable to cyber attacks. By mandating manufacturers to include reasonable security features in their products, the bill sought to enhance the overall cybersecurity posture of devices sold in Kentucky. The inclusion of definitions for key terms, such as connected device and unauthorized access, provided a solid foundation for the bill’s implementation and interpretation.

2. Reasonable Security Features

The requirement for manufacturers to equip connected devices with reasonable security features raises the question of what constitutes “reasonable” in terms of cybersecurity measures. As technology evolves rapidly, determining this standard can be challenging. The failure to define or provide specific guidelines for what constitutes “reasonable” may have contributed to the opposition faced by KY S 195. Critics of the bill may argue that without clear guidelines, manufacturers would struggle to comply, leading to potential legal challenges and ambiguity in enforcement.

3. Implications and Challenges

One potential challenge with the implementation of KY S 195 is the burden it places on manufacturers. Requiring manufacturers to incorporate specific security features may increase the cost of production, potentially leading to higher prices for consumers. Additionally, the bill could stifle innovation by imposing rigid security requirements, potentially hampering the development of new technologies. Striking a balance between device security and innovation is crucial for ensuring the long-term effectiveness of cybersecurity measures.

Reasons for Failure

The failure of KY S 195 can be attributed to several factors. First, the bill may have faced opposition from manufacturers and technology industry stakeholders who feared the increased costs and limitations imposed by the legislation. Second, the lack of specific guidelines for reasonable security features may have hindered support from legislators who were concerned about the vague nature of the bill. Lastly, the potential implications on consumer prices and innovation may have raised concerns among lawmakers. These factors likely contributed to the ultimate failure of KY S 195 in the Kentucky legislature.

Conclusion

The proposed amendments in KY S 195 aimed to address the pressing issue of cybersecurity in Kentucky. However, the bill’s failure to pass can be attributed to factors such as opposition from industry stakeholders, the lack of specific guidelines, and concerns regarding consumer prices and innovation. This analysis highlights the challenges associated with implementing cybersecurity policies and emphasizes the importance of careful consideration and collaboration to develop effective legislation in the future.

Need your ASSIGNMENT done? Use our paper writing service to score better and meet your deadline.


Click Here to Make an Order Click Here to Hire a Writer