Read the case study titled “Cenartech Security Case, Part 3” located in Part 3B of the textbook. Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you: Recommend a policy change to further protect Cenartech such as the one the CEO issued regarding the notification of the IT department when employees join or leave the company. Evaluate Brian’s actions in the beginning of the case and determine what he should have done differently in order to prevent the attack. In response to the previous question, speculate the challenges Brian would have encountered in pursuing your suggested changes. Explain what you would have done differently in attempts to help the company succeed, in part by mitigating risks, had you been the CEO of Cenartech. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

Title: Policy Recommendations for Enhancing Cenartech Security: A Case Study Analysis

Introduction:
Cenartech, a leading technology firm, faces a critical challenge regarding the protection of its confidential information. This paper aims to provide policy recommendations for enhancing Cenartech’s security, evaluate Brian’s actions during the initial stages of the case study, and discuss potential challenges he may have encountered. Additionally, an analysis of what I, as the CEO of Cenartech, would have done differently to mitigate risks and ensure the company’s success will be presented.

Policy Recommendation:
To further protect Cenartech and mitigate potential security risks, a policy change should be implemented. This policy should mandate that employees notify the IT department of any changes in their employment status, such as joining or leaving the company, similar to the policy change enacted by the CEO. By facilitating timely and effective communication between employees and the IT department, this policy change will help ensure that access to sensitive information is promptly updated and controlled.

Evaluation of Brian’s Actions:
In the beginning of the case study, Brian identified a suspicious contractor who had unauthorized access to Cenartech’s internal network. However, his actions did not effectively prevent the subsequent attack. Brian should have taken the following steps to prevent the attack:

1. Immediate Isolation: Upon discovering the contractor’s unauthorized access, Brian should have immediately isolated the contractor’s account from the internal network. This would have minimized the risk of further unauthorized access and potential data breaches.

2. Incident Response Team Activation: Brian should have promptly reported the incident to the Incident Response Team (IRT). By involving the IRT, an experienced team trained in handling such security incidents, the company would have benefited from their expertise and quick response to mitigate any potential threats.

3. Forensic Investigation: Brian should have initiated a forensic investigation to identify the extent of the contractor’s unauthorized access and any potential data compromises. This investigation would have enabled prompt remediation actions to be taken, while also preserving evidence for potential legal proceedings.

Challenges in Pursuing Recommended Changes:
Implementing the suggested policy change would have presented several challenges for Brian. Firstly, there may have been resistance from employees who may perceive the change as an invasion of privacy or an additional burden. Overcoming this resistance and gaining employee cooperation would have required effective internal communication and awareness campaigns to educate employees about the importance of such security measures.

Furthermore, integrating the policy change into existing workflow and communication channels may have posed technical challenges. The IT department would have to develop a streamlined and efficient process to handle notifications efficiently, and compatibility issues with existing systems and processes may arise.

Differences in CEO Approach:
As the CEO of Cenartech, I would have implemented additional measures to enhance the company’s security and mitigate risks. Firstly, I would have conducted regular security awareness training for all employees to promote a culture of security consciousness and emphasize the significance of their role in maintaining the company’s security.

Secondly, I would have established a regular risk assessment program to identify and prioritize risks proactively. This would have enabled the organization to allocate resources effectively and address potential vulnerabilities before they could be exploited.

Finally, I would have promoted a continuous improvement mindset within the organization by regularly reviewing and updating policies, procedures, and security controls to align with the evolving threat landscape.

Conclusion:
Enhancing Cenartech’s security measures requires a proactive approach and the implementation of appropriate policy changes. By recommending a policy change for employee notification, evaluating Brian’s actions, discussing potential challenges, and outlining my own approach as CEO, the recommendations provided aim to improve Cenartech’s security posture and safeguard the company’s confidential information. To succeed in today’s highly interconnected and digital environment, organizations must continually adapt and evolve their security measures to mitigate potential risks.

Need your ASSIGNMENT done? Use our paper writing service to score better and meet your deadline.


Click Here to Make an Order Click Here to Hire a Writer