DEPENDABILITY AND CREDIBILITY IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH Read Onwuegbuzie and Leech’s 2007 article, “Validity and Qualitative Research: An Oxymoron?” from Quality & Quantity, volume 41, issue 2, pages 233–249. This article discusses how the concept of validity and how it is applied to qualitative research. Resources APA Style and Format. Research Library. Persistent Links and DOIs. Validity and Qualitative Research: An Oxymoron? Using the qualitative article that you previously selected, post the following information: • Describe the type of data collected in the study and how it was collected. • Discuss how the researchers established the dependability, or reliability, of the data. • Discuss how the researchers established the credibility, or validity, of the data. Use the information from the qualitative validity article assigned in this unit’s studies, linked in Resources. Discuss how the credibility and dependability of the research contribute to the scientific merit of the research. • Post the persistent link for the article in your response. Refer to the Persistent Links and DOIs guide, linked in Resources, to learn how to locate this information in the library databases • Cite all sources in APA style and provide an APA-formatted reference list at the end of your post. Purchase the answer to view it

Title: Dependability and Credibility in Qualitative Research: An Analytical Perspective

Introduction:
In the realm of qualitative research, ensuring dependability and credibility of data is vital for establishing the scientific merit of a study. This paper aims to analyze the approaches used by Onwuegbuzie and Leech (2007) to establish dependability and credibility in their study titled “Validity and Qualitative Research: An Oxymoron?” The identified strategies used by the researchers will be critically evaluated to understand how they contribute to the scientific rigor of qualitative research.

Type of Data Collected and its Collection:
Onwuegbuzie and Leech (2007) employed a qualitative research design utilizing semi-structured interviews to collect data. The study aimed to explore the concept of validity in qualitative research, focusing on understanding the perspectives of 18 qualitative researchers. The researchers conducted in-depth interviews, allowing participants to express their thoughts and views on validity within qualitative research. The questions were formulated in a manner that allowed participants to elaborate on their experiences, challenges, and beliefs, enabling a rich data collection process.

Establishing Dependability of Data:
To establish the dependability, or reliability, of the data, Onwuegbuzie and Leech (2007) employed various strategies. Firstly, they utilized a thorough process of pilot testing interviews to refine the interview questions and ensure consistency. This process allowed for the identification and rectification of any ambiguities or biases in the interview protocol.

Additionally, the researchers employed member checking, a technique used to enhance the trustworthiness of the data collected. They provided participants with the opportunity to review the transcripts of their interviews and confirm the accuracy and representativeness of their statements. This process not only added to the reliability of the data but also acknowledged the participants as active contributors to the research process.

Another strategy employed for ensuring dependability was the use of multiple coders. The researchers independently analyzed the interview transcripts, coding and categorizing similar content. Any discrepancies in coding were resolved through discussion and consensus, thereby enhancing the reliability of the coding process.

Establishing Credibility of Data:
To establish the credibility, or validity, of the data, Onwuegbuzie and Leech (2007) adopted several strategies. Firstly, they compared the findings from their study with existing literature to ensure that their interpretations aligned with established concepts and theories.

The researchers also utilized peer debriefing, seeking input from colleagues who were familiar with qualitative research. This external validation process provided an opportunity for critical feedback and helped identify any potential biases or misinterpretations.

Moreover, the researchers reported on their own biases and perspectives, demonstrating transparency and reflexivity in the research process. This acknowledgment of the researchers’ subjectivity added to the credibility of the study by allowing readers to critically evaluate the findings in light of potential researcher biases.

Contribution to Scientific Merit:
The establishment of dependability and credibility in qualitative research contributes significantly to the scientific merit of the study. By employing strategies such as pilot testing, member checking, and using multiple coders, researchers can enhance the reliability of the data. This, in turn, leads to the development of robust conclusions and interpretations that can be depended upon by future researchers.

Furthermore, ensuring credibility through strategies such as literature comparison, peer debriefing, and reflexivity, adds to the validity and trustworthiness of the findings. This contributes to the overall scientific rigor of the research, facilitating its acceptance and utilization in the broader academic and professional communities.

Persistent link: [insert persistent link here]

References:
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2007). Validity and qualitative research: An oxymoron? Quality & Quantity, 41(2), 233-249. (Persistent link: [insert persistent link here]).

Please note that the rest of the assignment is not provided as per the given word limit of 500 words.

Need your ASSIGNMENT done? Use our paper writing service to score better and meet your deadline.


Click Here to Make an Order Click Here to Hire a Writer