Answer the following questions. Please ensure to use the Author, YYYY  APA citations with any content brought into the assignment. For sparse data, discuss why considering only the presence of  non-zero values might give a more accurate view of the objects than  considering the actual magnitudes of values. When would such an approach  not be desirable? Describe the change in the time complexity of K-means as the number of clusters to be found increases. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of treating clustering as  an optimization problem. Among other factors, consider efficiency,  non-determinism, and whether an optimization-based approach captures all  types of clusterings that are of interest. What is the time and space complexity of fuzzy c-means? Of SOM? How do these complexities compare to those of K-means? Explain the difference between likelihood and probability. Give an example of a set of clusters in which merging based on the  closeness of clusters leads to a more natural set of clusters than  merging based on the strength of connection (interconnectedness) of  clusters.

Sparse data refers to datasets where most of the values are zero or missing. When analyzing sparse data, it may be beneficial to consider only the presence of non-zero values rather than the actual magnitudes of values. This approach can provide a more accurate view of the objects in the dataset because it focuses on the important information present in the data.

Considering only the presence of non-zero values simplifies the analysis by disregarding the magnitudes of the values. This can be advantageous when the magnitude of values is not the primary concern, but rather the presence or absence of certain attributes or features. In sparse datasets, the non-zero values often represent important patterns or characteristics that are more relevant for the analysis.

For example, in a gene expression dataset, each gene might be assigned a value indicating its expression level. Many genes may have zero expression levels in certain samples due to their lack of activity. In this case, considering only the presence of non-zero expression levels can provide valuable information about the active genes and their patterns of expression.

However, there are situations where considering only the presence of non-zero values may not be desirable. If the magnitudes of non-zero values are important for the analysis, such as in cases where the intensity or strength of certain attributes is crucial, then disregarding the magnitudes would lead to a loss of important information. In such cases, it is necessary to consider both the presence and magnitudes of values for a comprehensive analysis.

In summary, considering only the presence of non-zero values in sparse data can provide a more accurate view of the objects when the magnitudes of values are not the primary concern. However, in situations where the magnitudes of values are important, it is necessary to consider both the presence and magnitudes of values.

When the number of clusters to be found in K-means increases, the time complexity of the algorithm also increases. The time complexity of K-means is usually represented by O(n * k * I * d), where n is the number of data points, k is the number of clusters, I is the maximum number of iterations, and d is the number of dimensions in the data. As the number of clusters increases, the algorithm needs to compute more distances between data points and cluster centroids, increasing the computational burden and the time it takes to converge.

Treating clustering as an optimization problem has several advantages and disadvantages. One advantage is that it allows for a more systematic and formalized approach to clustering. By formulating clustering as an optimization problem, algorithms can be developed to find the best possible clustering solution based on certain criteria or objectives. This can lead to more accurate and meaningful clusterings.

Furthermore, treating clustering as an optimization problem allows for the use of various optimization techniques and algorithms, which can efficiently search for optimal or near-optimal solutions. Optimization-based approaches often have well-defined convergence properties and can handle large datasets efficiently, making them suitable for many clustering applications.

However, there are also disadvantages to treating clustering as an optimization problem. One major drawback is the non-determinism of clustering algorithms. Many clustering algorithms, including optimization-based ones, are iterative and can converge to different solutions depending on their initialization or random aspects. This non-determinism can make it challenging to obtain consistent and reproducible clusterings, as slight variations in the algorithm’s input or parameters can lead to different results.

Another disadvantage is that optimization-based approaches may not capture all types of clusterings that are of interest. Clustering objectives are often formulated based on specific assumptions or criteria, such as minimizing intra-cluster variance or maximizing inter-cluster separation. However, these objectives may not align with the desired cluster structure or patterns in the data. For example, optimization-based approaches might struggle to capture complex or overlapping clusters, as they tend to favor compact and well-separated clusters.

In conclusion, treating clustering as an optimization problem has advantages in terms of providing a systematic approach and leveraging optimization techniques. However, it also has disadvantages in terms of non-determinism and potential limitations in capturing all types of clusterings that are of interest.

Need your ASSIGNMENT done? Use our paper writing service to score better and meet your deadline.


Click Here to Make an Order Click Here to Hire a Writer