After reading the provided article attached article. Please do research on the Daubert standard (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daubert_standard) and the Frye standard (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frye_standard). I strongly recommend doing additonal research as well. Then your deliverable in this assignment is a 2-page report (no more than 3 pages please) discussing how you would approach either (a) analyzing a new mobile forensics tool (2) what are the most important elements to you and (3) how you would justify your approach. Please be sure to: 1.    Outline and discuss the methodology that you will use. 2.    Provide a reasoned argument as to why the particular methodology (or methodologies) chosen is relevant. 3.    Identify key facts and identify key considerations to consider from a technical / forensic standpoint that the company should consider. 4.    Identify key facts and identify key considerations to consider from a legal standpoint that you should consider. 5.    Discuss in detail (step by step) the process that you will use to collect evidence and discuss the relevant guidelines that need to be followed when collecting digital evidence. 6.    Be sure to back your reasoning with case law as applicable.

Title: Approach to Analyzing a New Mobile Forensics Tool

Introduction:
The field of mobile forensics has gained immense importance with the proliferation of mobile devices and their role in criminal investigations. As technology evolves, new mobile forensics tools are constantly being developed to extract and analyze digital evidence from mobile devices. To ensure the reliability and admissibility of evidence in court, it is essential to adopt a rigorous scientific methodology in evaluating these tools.

Methodology:
In analyzing a new mobile forensics tool, a comprehensive and systematic approach should be adopted. The following methodology is recommended:

1. Literature Review: Conduct a thorough review of existing research papers, whitepapers, and publications related to the new mobile forensics tool. This step enables the identification of established techniques, best practices, and limitations in mobile forensics.

2. Tool Validation: Validate the new mobile forensics tool by assessing its reliability, accuracy, and repeatability. This can be achieved through a series of controlled experiments, using benchmark devices and standardized test cases. The validation process should involve experts in the field who have extensive knowledge of mobile operating systems and digital forensic techniques.

3. Comparative Analysis: Compare the performance and capabilities of the new mobile forensics tool with existing well-established tools. This analysis should include factors such as extraction time, data recovery effectiveness, reporting capabilities, and compatibility with different operating systems and device models.

4. Collaboration with Experts: Seek input and feedback from renowned experts in the field of mobile forensics. Their experience and knowledge can provide valuable insights into the strengths, weaknesses, and potential vulnerabilities of the new tool.

Relevance of Methodology:
The chosen methodology is highly relevant as it encompasses key aspects of scientific inquiry and evaluation. By conducting a literature review, important insights and established techniques can be identified, ensuring that the analysis is informed by the existing body of knowledge. Validating the new tool through controlled experiments establishes its reliability and repeatability, reducing the risk of erroneous or misleading results. Comparative analysis enables a comprehensive evaluation, ensuring that the new tool meets or exceeds established standards. Collaboration with experts adds credibility to the assessment process, incorporating domain-specific knowledge and practical insights.

Key Technical and Forensic Considerations:
When evaluating a new mobile forensics tool, several key technical and forensic considerations should be taken into account:

1. Compatibility: Assess the tool’s compatibility with various mobile operating systems, device models, and versions. Inability to extract data from specific devices or operating systems can significantly impact its effectiveness.

2. Data Integrity and Validation: Evaluate the tool’s ability to preserve the integrity of extracted data and validate its integrity through cryptographic hashing or other appropriate methods.

3. Accuracy and Completeness: Examine the accuracy and completeness of data extraction. The tool should reliably recover various types of data, including messages, call logs, images, videos, application data, and system files.

4. Artifacts and Deleted Data: Assess the tool’s capability to recover artifacts, such as temporary files and deleted data. The ability to reconstruct and interpret fragmented data can greatly enhance the forensic analysis process.

Legal Considerations:
From a legal standpoint, the following considerations should be taken into account during the analysis of a new mobile forensics tool:

1. Admissibility: Evaluate whether the tool’s results and the procedures used to obtain them meet the admissibility requirements of relevant legal jurisdictions, such as the Daubert standard or the Frye standard.

2. Chain of Custody: Ensure the tool’s ability to establish and maintain a proper chain of custody for the digital evidence extracted from mobile devices. This includes accurately documenting the handling, storage, and transportation of the evidence.

3. Privacy and Data Protection: Assess the tool’s compliance with applicable privacy laws and regulations, ensuring that the extraction process does not infringe upon individuals’ privacy rights.

Process of Collecting Evidence:
The process of collecting digital evidence using the new mobile forensics tool should follow a structured step-by-step approach. The process should adhere to established guidelines, such as those outlined by organizations like the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) or the Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence (SWGDE). The guidelines typically include:

1. Identification: Identify the relevant mobile devices for examination and document their unique identifiers, serial numbers, and other identifying information.

2. Acquisition: Safely and forensically acquire a binary image of the mobile device’s storage media, preserving the integrity of the data.

3. Preservation: Ensure appropriate measures are taken to securely preserve the acquired evidence, maintaining its integrity throughout the entire analysis process.

4. Analysis: Conduct a comprehensive analysis of the acquired evidence using appropriate forensic tools and techniques, ensuring the integrity and admissibility of the results.

5. Reporting: Document the analysis process, methodologies employed, and the findings in a clear and concise report that complies with accepted forensic reporting standards.

Case Law and Precedents:
To support the chosen methodology and approach, it is essential to back the reasoning with relevant case law and precedents. By referencing and citing case law, the analysis gains credibility and establishes a legal foundation for the chosen methodologies.

Conclusion:
The suggested methodology provides a structured and scientific approach to analyzing a new mobile forensics tool. By conducting a literature review, validating the tool, comparing its performance, and collaborating with experts, the analysis process can ensure reliability and maintain legal admissibility. Key technical and forensic considerations, as well as legal and procedural aspects, should be carefully addressed to ensure a comprehensive and accurate analysis of the tool’s capabilities and limitations.

Need your ASSIGNMENT done? Use our paper writing service to score better and meet your deadline.


Click Here to Make an Order Click Here to Hire a Writer