# 1.Assignment Create an alternative decision matrix for the case system. Using Excel or Word, develop a decision matrix to be used to evaluate three proposed design alternatives (alternatives A, B, and C). The idea is to create a worksheet that can be applied to any set of alternatives. Criteria: Decision matrix has columns for criteria weights and points available, and columns that represent three proposals. Within each proposal include columns for points assigned and the product of points assigned times criteria weight. The bottom row of the matrix contains column totals. Your essay should be 3 pages in content and fully explore all of the following items described above. Include at least 2 outside citations (not including your text) and use proper APA formatting. Atleast 2 In-line citations and references required. 2. Weekly Memo – Memo should be related to the discussions , assignment and should be one page(citations,references, APA not required). Relate this weeks assignment and discussions to your work in office/organization. 3.Discussions 1) Describe the primary activities of the design phase of the SDLC. 2)Distinguish between the two-tier, three-tier, and n-tier client–server architectures. Each discussion should have atleast 3 paragraphs, 2 inline citations, 2 references. Due by next tuesday evening.

Title: Alternative Decision Matrix for Evaluating Design Alternatives

Introduction:

In the field of decision-making, a decision matrix provides a structured approach to evaluate multiple alternatives based on predetermined criteria. This assignment aims to create an alternative decision matrix for evaluating three proposed design alternatives – A, B, and C. The matrix will be developed using either Excel or Word and will incorporate criteria weights, points available, points assigned, and the product of points assigned times criteria weight. This comprehensive analysis will facilitate a better understanding of the different design alternatives and aid in making an informed decision.

I. Decision Matrix Development:

To begin, we will utilize either Excel or Word to construct a decision matrix. The matrix will consist of columns for criteria weights and points available, as well as additional columns to represent the three design proposals, A, B, and C. Each proposal’s columns will include sections for points assigned and the product of points assigned times criteria weight. Lastly, the matrix will include a bottom row to display column totals, enabling easy comparison and evaluation of the design alternatives.

II. Criteria Weighting:

Assigning appropriate weights to each criterion is a crucial step in the decision matrix development process. The weights reflect the relative importance of each criterion in relation to the overall objective. For instance, if cost is a primary concern, it may be assigned a higher weight compared to other criteria such as functionality or aesthetics. By applying weights to the criteria, we can ensure that the evaluation is objective and aligned with the desired outcome.

III. Evaluation of Design Alternatives:

With the decision matrix in place, the next step is to evaluate the design alternatives, A, B, and C, based on the predetermined criteria. Points will be assigned for each criterion, considering their respective importance and relevance to the overall objective. These points may be derived through expert judgment, user feedback, or other relevant sources.

IV. Product of Points Assigned:

In order to derive a comprehensive understanding of each design alternative’s overall performance, the product of points assigned times criteria weight will be calculated. This calculation provides a weighted evaluation of each proposal, taking into account both the assigned points and the relative importance of each criterion. By calculating this product for each alternative, we can determine which alternative aligns best with the desired outcome and contributes most effectively to the objectives at hand.

V. Conclusion:

In conclusion, the alternative decision matrix provides a systematic approach to evaluate multiple design alternatives based on predetermined criteria. By incorporating criteria weighting and calculating the product of points assigned times criteria weight, a comprehensive assessment of each proposal can be achieved. This methodology allows for objective decision-making, ultimately leading to the selection of the most suitable design alternative. In future endeavors, this decision matrix can be applied to any similar set of alternatives, streamlining the evaluation and decision-making process.

### Need your ASSIGNMENT done? Use our paper writing service to score better and meet your deadline.

Click Here to Make an Order Click Here to Hire a Writer